"You shall know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free"
Publisher / Editor:
Paul Hayden

The Border Barrier Only Has To Be Funded Once

September 16, 2019

Let’s say you own a house. With the house comes a yard and with that comes a lot of various things for the upkeep of the property. Things like a lawnmower, hedge clippers, paint supplies, gas cans, etc. The problem is you have nowhere to store them. Consequently, they get damaged by weather and people sneak into your yard and steal your stuff – because you don’t have a fence.

So you propose to your wife, or whomever resides with you (who knows anymore?), to shell out the money to build a lockable shed in the back yard.

Well, your other half isn’t keen on spending the money. You explain that the family can cut it by moving some money around and cutting back.

Instead of listening reasonably to your proposal, your other half - he, she, or it - goes on a tirade, exclaiming that taking from one portion of the household budget will hurt the well-being of the family.

Normally, you would cave and tacitly agree, but not this time. This time you sit he, she or it down and explain that this budget shifting and tightening is but a temporary discomfort. The shed is a one-and-done expense. Once it’s built, it will require little if any maintenance. After it’s constructed, the other portions of the budget will continue getting funding as normal.

Now does any of this sound familiar? If you said it sounds a lot like Trump’s border wall/fence, you win the gold star – which I’ll send you psychically.

There – I just did. Congratulations! (h/t: Pat Gray)

Every year, each federal agency and department gets their allotment of cash to spend/waste. Thanks to the magic of base-line budgeting, they’ll get more than they did last year, regardless of what any politician says.

And none of us are sure what all these government agencies really do – how they spend all those billions, so we joke about shovel-ready jobs and “good enough for government work.”

Speaking of shovel-ready - there’s an old joke, about two guys walking along the road. One was digging a hole, the other one waited a minute and filled the hole back.

Then they moved on and after about 10 feet they did the same - digging up, waiting a minute, and filling it back up. They went on doing this for a little while. One guy who was watching them eagerly just couldn’t resist anymore, and asked, "Are you guys mad or what? What the hell are you doing?"

The guys replied. "We are from the government Forest department. We are a three-guy team. My job is to dig up a hole, the middle guy plants a tree, and this guy fills the hole back. The middle guy called in sick today."

This is what we envision when we think of government work. Work-a-day tasks that we blindly and continually fund year after year – forever.

But it’s different when building structures, like say a border barrier, even for the government. Unlike having to fund hundreds of worthless government departments for all eternity, a border barrier only has to be funded once. And once it’s completed, all the various departments that temporarily forfeited a minuscule amount of their budgets will again be fully funded – and beyond.

In other words, don’t buy any of this clap-trap that there will be suffering, or the Defense Department can’t afford a temporary lapse of a tiny fraction of their budget. Remember, the DOD is still a government entity, so trust me when I say they waste and lose a lot more money every year than is being “diverted” to build the border barrier.

The people whining about how diverting $3.6 billion out of a $4.5 trillion budget will somehow be damaging to health or safety or security are doing so for purely political reasons. Anyone who complains about this one-time expenditure is just dead-set against building the border barrier in the first place.

Anyway, it gives new meaning to the Department of De-Fence! Get it?

Comments: 0
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
2500 characters max
Copyright ©2019

Brent Smith, "The Common Constitutionalist," offers not just conservative commentary and analysis, but a blend of politics, history, arts, science, and humor. Whoever said conservatives aren’t funny? Yeah, I know…most people. Brent is a contributing writer for numerous online publications. When he is not burning the midnight oil writing his insightful commentaries, he is raising his two teenage sons to be patriots and Conservatives.
Visit Brent Smith's website at www.commonconstitutionalist.com