"You shall know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free"
Publisher / Editor:
Paul Hayden

Trump is Constitutionally Correct in Ending Birthright Citizenship

November 5, 2018

The subject of birthright citizenship is once again in the news. President Trumps says he intends to sign an Executive order ending the practice. Leftists and faux-constitutional scholars are up in arms. What a shock.

CNN writes that, “Such a step would be regarded as an affront to the US Constitution, which was amended 150 years ago to include the words: ‘All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.’”

In 2015, then-candidate Trump exclaimed his desire to deport all illegal aliens. In rebuttal, Robert Tracinski at The Federalist  argued that deporting birthright citizens would be a direct assault on the Constitution and “the thousand year history of English common law.”

Tracinski explained that at the time of the founding, America embraced birthright citizenship - that “for the Founders, rejecting jus soli or birthright citizenship would have meant either greatly restricting the growth and expansion of the new nation or, more likely, creating a system in which there was a large and growing subpopulation of people who were disenfranchised in the land of their own birth. An idea totally incompatible with a government based on the consent of the governed.”

He then proceeded to the 14th amendment, which is what all leftists and faux-constitutionalists use to advance “birthright citizenship.”

However, he neglects to mention that Section 1 of the 14th amendment was written to bestow citizenship on the freed slaves.

The 14th amendment, ratified July 9, 1868, reads: “Section1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

If one wishes to fully understand the Constitution and the Amendments, one must go back to the source. This is what is called original intent. By doing so one can glean not only what they wrote but the motive behind it.

Senator Jacob Howard authored the citizenship clause (Section 1) of the 14th Amendment. He defined precisely what he meant by, “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

Howard said:

Every person born within the limits of the United States, subject to their jurisdiction, is, by virtue of natural law and national law, a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great issue in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.

His statement, “but will include every other class of persons,” meant the freed slaves.

As further proof that he did not intend for just anyone born within the United States to be a citizen, Howard added that, “Indians born within the limits of the United States and who maintain their tribal relations, are not, in the sense of this amendment, born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”

Senator Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, supported Howard, contending that “‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ meant not owing allegiance to anybody else...subject to the complete jurisdiction of the United States.”

Well, it doesn't get much clearer than that. There can be no question of Senator Howard’s intent and no question of what he meant by, "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.”

In other words, President Trump, by his Executive Order, wouldn’t be usurping the Constitution, but merely resetting it back to the original intent of the 14th Amendment.

What a concept.

Comments: 0
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
2500 characters max
Copyright ©2018

Brent Smith, "The Common Constitutionalist," offers not just conservative commentary and analysis, but a blend of politics, history, arts, science, and humor. Whoever said conservatives aren’t funny? Yeah, I know…most people. Brent is a contributing writer for numerous online publications. When he is not burning the midnight oil writing his insightful commentaries, he is raising his two teenage sons to be patriots and Conservatives.
Visit Brent Smith's website at www.commonconstitutionalist.com