Fake Signature - Fake President

One question that has often been asked about the Biden presidency was, "Who is in charge?" The Daily Mail recently reported that "Biden autopen signature appears on almost every document.” The report said, "Many documents over the entire Biden term were signed President Joe Biden and were done using an autopen." According to a new report by an arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation, questions have been sparked over who was pulling the strings during the former president's four years in office. If Biden didn't sign thousands of documents, who did? The question that should follow is, "Who was the President?"

A survey on X showed responses to the question: Do you support President Biden's blanket pardons of Fauci, Milley, Cheney, and the rest of the J6 Committee?

• Yes 18%

• No 32.3%

• Hell No! 49.7%

1,052 votes Final results

One must wonder if the survey participants knew that Biden didn't sign the pardon, but a non-human auto-pen under the control of a White House staffer.  Would the information on who really signed it make a difference in their vote? If you go to this link, you will see the signatures of five pardons with signatures melding on top of each other, making a perfect match. This situation not only raises questions about the legitimacy of these pardons but also about the potential implications for the fairness and integrity of our justice system.

Some have reported that Biden issued over 8,000 pardons while he was President. Various websites suggest that getting a pardon could cost upwards of $10,000 or more. If we take the $10,000 times 8,000 pardons, we look at $80 million or more in legal fees during the Biden term of office. One last point on the process. You can apply for a pardon in two ways; the first is through the Office of the Pardon Attorney in the Department of Justice, and the other is to apply to the President himself. 

The President is supposed to familiarize himself with the case and the pardon request. If he or she agrees, he or she is required to sign the pardon to make it official. These are the last two items we will address now. 

Knowledge of the Case

Special Council Robert Hur was charged with the responsibility to determine if then-President Biden was in violation of the Presidential Records Act in not securing the record in a safe and secure place. In his final report, he indicated that Biden should not have possessed the records and that he was guilty of not properly securing them. Hur made the following observations and recommendations to Attorney General Merrick Garland. Special counsel Robert Hur's portrait of the president was of a man who couldn't remember when he served as Barack Obama's vice president or the year when his beloved son Beau died. These observations of the sitting president cast serious doubt on Biden's mental capacity to lead and his ability to serve another four-year term.

In deciding not to charge Biden with any crimes, the special counsel wrote that in a potential trial, "Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview with him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."

Biden's first pardon was on April 26, 2022, to Betty Jo Bogans; Biden issued eight more pardons in 2022. He went on and issued five more pardons in 2023. His first pardon in 2024 was on April 24. The math says that from April 24, 2024, to January 19, 2025, he issued 8,051 pardons in 271 days. Biden would have to sign thirty pardons daily, seven days a week, 24 hours a day for 271 days. All of this was being done while he was continuing to decline in capacity. 

I don't see how Joe was able to read all 8,000-plus pardons and commutations - not counting the pardon requests he rejected. The Office of Pardon Attorney in the Justice Department reported that over 13,000 requests were submitted in 2024. Only the President can make the decision to pardon, so Joe would have had to review more than the 13,000 requests.

Did he read and sign all pardons and commutations? President Biden had no clue whether he had signed a critical executive order during a conversation, or other important documents. Last year, Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson admitted he left the meeting fearing the nation was in "serious trouble” with Biden as president.

President Biden insisted to the Louisiana lawmaker that he never issued the order to freeze new liquid natural gas export permits, even though he had signed off on it less than a month earlier.

Johnson told the Free Press' Bari Weiss he didn't believe Biden was lying, but was left to think the then-81-year-old leader "genuinely didn't know what he had signed."

The troubling encounter happened in the Oval Office in early 2024 when the two met to discuss the latest aid package for Ukraine.

Afterward, Johnson asked Biden why he had inked an executive order pausing new permits for American liquid natural gas exports to European allies - a crucial issue for his constituents in the Bayou State, which, in 2023, handled 61% of the nation's LNG exports, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

In a story by Yahoo News titled "Inside the White House Cover-Up of Biden's Health Crisis," President Joe Biden scanned the crowd at a conference on hunger in September 2022 and called out, "Jackie, are you here? Where's Jackie?" No response. "I think she was…she was going to be here."

Jackie Walorski, one of the conference organizers, had died in a car crash the previous month. After her death, the White House sent condolences in Biden's name, saying how he "appreciated her partnership" in setting up the conference.

Karine Jean-Pierre, White House press secretary, explained Biden's asking for Jackie by saying she was "top of mind" for the President at the conference. When questioned by reporters, she repeated the answer "top of mind" over a dozen times. It was a nonsensical response. If Walorski was "top of mind" for Biden, her death would have been, too.

My last example was the debate with Donald Trump. We knew from almost the very beginning that Biden was in serious trouble. The rest is history. He left the race and virtually disappeared from the public. 

To regain some of his status, he decided to attend the African meeting celebrating the construction of a major dam project and proceeded to fall asleep at his desk. What a great disappointment for the Democrats and embarrassment for the American people to have their president fall asleep at an important meeting.

Conclusion

The question that has been going around for almost four years and remains unanswered today is, who was running the White House in the Biden Administration? The president is the only elected official at the Federal government level who can issue a pardon. It is clear to me that he did not have the mental capacity to review thousands of petitions for pardons, much less sign more than 8,000 of them. 

I must believe that the staff took away Joe's power and responsibility for pardons because they believed he could not handle the job. Someone, or more than one person, took the power away from Joe and did the job. The person or persons in charge of the autopen never looked back to keep the president informed of what they were doing. If the president wasn't making the decisions and signing the pardons, then they are invalid under Article 2 of the Constitution and should be withdrawn.

One last thought

There were 37 people on death row in Federal Prisons, and Joe Biden commuted them to life in prison with no parole. I wonder how the families who lost a family member feel about the waiving of the death penalty. President Biden, or perhaps better said, the controller of the autopen, does not have the right to override the criminal justice system.