Tim Walz – Tampons In The Boy’s Bathroom, But No Christian Teachers In The Classrooms

It is easy to picture pre-adolescent boys pretending to be Superman or Batman or GI Joe, but the imagination comes under assault when trying to think of where boys are going to put tampons.

If we allow boys to choose, change, or imagine they are a different sex than what the doctor decided at birth, why don’t we let those who think they are Superman, jump off a ten-story building, or those who think they are Batman, paint daddy’s car black and roar down the interstate? Should we let the little GI Joes grab one of dad's hunting rifles and blow his little friends to kingdom come?

If we are going to act on one fantasy, should we not act on all of them?

If the answer to these questions is understood, why don’t we understand that boys don’t need tampons? In fact, we do know that, with the exception of the Governor of the State of Minnesota.

Other perversions from the Governor of "L’etoile du Nord"

Most perversion is simple evidence of a moral decline, and in the case of Tim Walz the laws already signed and soon to go into practice are perverted, and heavily discriminatory, and unconstitutional. We don’t need an interview or a debate to decide what laws Walz may want for the country, we already know what kind of laws he signed into existence for his own state.

The all-new teacher licensing laws for the state of Minnesota will start in July of 2025.

The rules say: “The teacher fosters an environment that ensures student identities such as race/ethnicity, national origin, language, sex and gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, physical/developmental/emotional ability, socioeconomic class, and religious beliefs are historically and socially contextualized, affirmed, and incorporated into a learning environment where students are empowered to learn and contribute as their whole selves.”

In the minds of Minnesota’s lawmakers and Gov. Tim Walz, the teachers must possess a special quality called “cultural competency” or they can hit the road.

The serious Bible-believing Christian who says that only heterosexual marriages are legitimate and only identities that were recognized at birth are to be recognized, cannot get licensed in the state.

Any religion that will not affirm the non-heterosexual queer policies of the new law will also be refused licensing. It may be Muslim, Hindu or any and all other religious adherents now practicing their faith in the United States.

The choice is bigger than we may want to imagine.

To violate the biblical faith will destroy our standing with our God and put our future at risk. To resist means their will be lawsuits, probably in a case-by-case situation.

For the truly faithful the catchphrase will be – let the trial begin.

The Federalist said in a recently published article, “Minnesota’s new teacher requirements also require teachers to agree that the taxpayers supplying their salaries and the people who created the school system that will employ them are racists, and affirm other cultural Marxist beliefs.”

The new laws are indirectly accusing those who pay teacher’s salaries of being racists and bigots.

Such licensing laws are ‘antichrist’ and they leave no room for the true believer to bring their faith into their beloved profession.

This is what we can expect more of if the Harris-Walz ticket is dragged across the finish line by American voters.

For now, they are satisfied to drag us before the school licensing boards, the courts, and the courts of public opinion.

What will Christians do, and what can they say?

It is this simple.

“And ye shall be brought before governors and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak: for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you.” Matthew 10:18-20

Just because the demons have spoken, does not mean that God has lost His voice – you are His voice.

This is a bigoted, unconstitutional law, that begs to be challenged.