The Proposed Anti-Lynching Law

There's already a law against it!

February 25, 2019


Two foolish Democrat presidential hopefuls - Kamala Harris and Corey Booker – immediately jumped on the Jussie Smollet band-wagon as soon as they heard reports of the supposed hate crime. They both described it as a “modern-day” lynching and tried to tie it to an anti-lynching bill awaiting passage by House Democrats.

Their first mistake was believing the hoax when not a scrap of evidence existed. A few days later, when Smollett’s lies began to be exposed, they told reporters that they didn’t want to comment until all the facts were in – apparently forgetting their earlier rush to judgment when NO facts were available.

Their second – and bigger – mistake was trying to link the anti-lynching bill currently held up by Nancy Pelosi in the House to Smollett’s elaborate hoax. According to police reports, a short piece of clothesline – not rope – was loosely looped around his neck. It was not tied into a noose, and there were no marks on his neck. In other words, there was no attempted lynching as proclaimed by Kamala Harris and Corey Booker.

What alerted detectives to the fact that the “hate crime” had been staged was the fact that 42 minutes after the supposed attack Smollett still had the twine around his neck. Any sane person who thought someone was trying to lynch him would immediately remove the offensive item. But he wanted to make sure the police saw it.

The proposed law is not needed because there are already dozens of laws against lynching, in every state and in the federal statutes. They call it murder. “But this is worse than murder – it’s a hate crime.” I don’t know if the dead people would agree with that – they’re just as dead, no matter the method.

The point is that you can’t have a statute for every possible way in which someone can commit murder – whether or not it’s classified as a “hate crime.” “A Law Forbidding Murder using Poison.” “A Law Forbidding Murder using a Knife.” “A Law Forbidding Murder using an Axe.” You get the point.

The only reason these Dems have tried to connect Smollett’s hoax to the proposed legislation is as a publicity stunt. Because a hate-filled racist punk named Jussie Smollett tried to convince the world that white people had placed a piece of twine around his neck, they tried to use this racist stunt to gain publicity for themselves and incite racial hatred.

There was a time when anti-lynching legislation would have made sense – hate crime or not. Between 1882 and 1951 4,730 people were lynched in the United States, of which 73% were black and 23% were white. The last reported lynching of a black man was in 1981, although that was not actually a lynching. The victim, Michael Donald, was first beaten to death and then hung from a tree.

Even though lynching is murder, and murder was already against the law, if the Democrats had wanted to make a symbolic gesture by criminalizing something that was already a crime, they had a century to pass it.

Oh, wait. An anti-lynching bill was proposed in 1918 – by a white Republican named Leonidas Dyer. It would have made lynching a federal crime, and it passed the House overwhelmingly. But it was filibustered in the Senate – by the DEMOCRATS. There have been 240 attempts to re-introduce the bill in the last 100 years, but none have passed. Almost every attempt was blocked by Southern Democrats.

Currently, although it is largely symbolic since there is no longer a need for such a bill, an anti-lynching bill passed was by the Republican Senate at the end of 2018. Now it sits waiting for the Democrat-controlled House to approve it. But they are far too busy persecuting the president and trying to figure out ways to impeach him.


INTERNET RESOURCES:

The Dyer Anti-Lynching Bill

After More than 200 Attempts, Senate Finally Passes Anti-Lynching Bill; Still Needs House Approval


Comments: 0
You!
Note:
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
    
Copyright ©2019

 
Tom Barrett is the Founder and Publisher of www.ConservativeTruth.org. He has written thousands of articles that have been republished in national newspapers and on hundreds of websites, and is a frequent guest on radio and television shows. His unique viewpoint on social, moral and political issues from a Biblical worldview have resulted in invitations to speak at churches, conferences, Money Shows, colleges, and on TV (including the 700 Club). Tom is also an expert speaker and writer on the subject of Biblical Finance, & is the Founder www.ChristianFinancialConcepts.com. 
Visit Dr. Tom Barrett's website at www.DrTom.TV