Error processing SSI file

Understanding Global Warming

Part 2:  The Atmosphere & Weather

July 18, 2001

(last revised August 30)

by Bob Webster

Among other things, an objective view of global warming is predicated on knowledge of our atmosphere and weather. Part 2 of this series examines the composition of earth's atmosphere and the nature of weather.

Since CO2 is referred to as a "pollutant" and the primary (in some quarters, the only) cause of global warming, this particular atmospheric gas is examined together with the role it plays maintaining planetary life and moderating earth's temperature to provide a suitable environment for life on this planet. (More about the "greenhouse effect" and what causes it in Part 4 of this series)

The cyclic nature of weather is examined to reveal how long term climate trends cannot possibly be extrapolated from relatively short periods of either global warming or global cooling. Part 3 of this series examines climate and natural warming and cooling cycles.

The planet we know as Earth consists of three parts, the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, and the lithosphere. The lithosphere is the solid portion of the planet (soil, rocks, minerals). The hydrosphere consists of all the planet's water, whether the oceans, lakes, rivers and streams or ground water found within the lithosphere. The vast portion of the hydrosphere is found in the oceans that cover about 71% of the earth's surface and contain 97% of the planet's water.[1] Finally, the atmosphere is that gaseous portion of the earth that rests upon the hydrosphere and lithosphere, extending hundreds of miles upward toward interplanetary space.[2] All of these components of the planet earth interact with each other and each contributes to weather and climate. The impact of the hydrosphere on climate and global temperature trends cannot be overlooked and will be examined more closely in Parts 3 and 4 of this series.

First, a few definitions of important terms:

carbon dioxide (CO2):  a colorless, odorless, incombustible gas, CO2, somewhat heavier than air, that passes out of the lungs in respiration: produced commercially and used widely in fire extinguishers, carbonated beverages, etc.: in photosynthesis, carbon dioxide and water are absorbed by plants, which synthesize certain carbohydrates and release oxygen into the air.[3]

pollutant:  something that pollutes; esp., a harmful chemical or waste material discharged into the water or atmosphere.[4]

pollute:  to make unclean, impure, or corrupt; defile; contaminate; dirty[5]

weather:  the general condition of the atmosphere at a particular time and place, with regard to the temperature, moisture, cloudiness, etc.[6]

The Atmosphere

Earth's atmosphere is primarily composed of nitrogen and oxygen which together account for 99% of all atmospheric gases (78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen). The table below lists the top ten components of the atmosphere in order of their abundance:[7]

Gas % of Volume
Nitrogen
Oxygen
Argon
Carbon Dioxide
Neon
Helium
Methane
Krypton
Hydrogen
Nitrous Oxide
    78.084%
    20.946%
    00.934%
    00.033%
    00.001818%
    00.000524%
    00.0002%
    00.000114%
    00.00005%
    00.00005%

Water Vapor (H2O)

In addition to the gases listed in the table above, water vapor is present in the atmosphere in varying concentrations. Depending on season and region, water vapor concentrations equate to a layer of water ranging from less than 2 millimeters (in polar winter regions) to about 45 millimeters (in equatorial regions). If all atmospheric water vapor were reduced to a layer of water encircling the planet, that layer would be about 30 millimeters (1") thick.[8]

Oxygen

It is worth noting that these figures have not been constant over geologic time. For example, the concentration of oxygen at 20%-21% rose gradually to its present level. However, despite natural production of oxygen by plant photosynthesis, the level of oxygen is unlikely to go higher as a result of oxygen consumption by fire. This balance is critical to life on earth since an increase of 5% in atmospheric oxygen relative to inert buffer gases would make plant life so combustible that "prairies, forests, and even tropical jungles [would] constantly be catching fire, consuming oxygen, and increasing carbon dioxide and ash particles in the atmosphere."[9,10]

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Similarly, atmospheric carbon dioxide is known to have changed dramatically in the recent geologic past:

"During the last major glaciation, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere fell drastically, by about 25%, reaching its lowest level during the last 2,000 years of so of the Ice Age. . . . Then, at about the time the interglacial began, carbon dioxide became more abundant. Scientists have not yet pinpointed whether the carbon dioxide level increased before or after the climate changed ..."[11]

Carbon dioxide is constantly produced and consumed by both natural and anthropogenic (resulting from actions of mankind) forces. Natural production of CO2 is 29 times that produced by humans (anthropogenic) through burning of fossil fuels and forest clearing.[12] Fire, volcanic activity, insect and animal life and plant decay are among the major natural sources of carbon dioxide. The most significant contributor to anthropogenic CO2 is fossil fuel burning, which accounts for about 75% of the anthropogenic total with the remainder likely due to deforestation.[13] One of the largest producers of CO2 "may well be termites, whose digestive activities are responsible for about ... 10 times ... the present [1990] world production of CO2 from burning fossil fuel."[14]

To appreciate how small a portion of the atmosphere CO2 makes, consider this example. The driving distance from Hartford, CT, to San Fransisco, CA is just under 3000 miles. If that distance were to represent the total atmosphere, then you'd have to drive from Hartford, CT, to 28 miles west of Cleveland, OH, to represent the portion of the atmosphere consisting of oxygen. To represent the atmospheric portion consisting of CO2, you'd have to drive from Hartford, CT, just one mile down the road!

CO2 As A "Pollutant"

The negative impact of referring to CO2 as a "pollutant" is not accidental. Time magazine, in its April 9th edition (pp 30-31) depicts CO2 emissions as belching black clouds from industrial smokestacks - yet CO2 is both colorless and odorless!

Since carbon dioxide occurs naturally in our atmosphere and is a necessary ingredient for plant life, why is it referred to as a pollutant? Doesn't seem to fit the definition, does it? The Greening Earth Society Virtual Climate Alert, Vol. 2, No. 32 (August 1, 2001) states:

"The insistence that carbon dioxide (CO2) is a pollutant is puzzling given literally thousands of experiments pointing to the reality of CO2's function as a building block of nature. Many within the environmental community either won't acknowledge -- or refuse to accept -- the ecological benefits of a higher concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere."[15]

Of course, if one were determined to make CO2 appear an evil substance to an unwitting public, the term "pollutant" works quite well.

CO2 accounts for only one-third of one-tenth of one percent of atmospheric gases. However, since CO2 levels vary and there is conflicting data that suggest concentrations ranging from 0.03% to 0.05% (0.033% in the chart above), for the sake of this discussion we'll assume the higher proportion to give the global warming alarmists the figure they generally support. Estimates of anthropogenic CO2 production during the past 200 years vary widely from 5% (realistic) to as much as 22% (highly suspect) of total atmospheric CO2. Yet, in order to reach the higher figure, one must assume all the increase in CO2 during the past 200 years is from anthropogenic sources - a highly dubious assumption, considering how little is understood about natural CO2 variability during the past 600 million years. For the sake of this discussion, we'll again give the global warming alarmists the generosity of assuming anthropogenic sources account for a full 15% of total atmospheric CO2.

Despite CO2 being a far more efficient heat trap, clouds and water vapor (H2O) account for "over 98% of the current greenhouse effect."[16, 17] Consequently, atmospheric CO2 cannot account for more than 2% of total greenhouse warming. Anthropogenic CO2, even at the higher estimate of 15% of total CO2, would account for at most 0.3% of greenhouse warming (15% of 2%). If the more generally accepted lower figure is assumed (anthropogenic CO2 only 5% of total CO2), then anthropogenic CO2 contribution to greenhouse warming drops from 0.3% to 0.1% - one-tenth of one percent! The greenhouse effect will be discussed in greater detail in Part 4 of this series.

If there is anything that can be said with certainty, it is that there is great uncertainty about the contribution of anthropogenic CO2 to any change in worldwide climate.

Weather

Recalling the definition of weather as "the general condition of the atmosphere at a particular time and place, with regard to the temperature, moisture, cloudiness, etc.", it is helpful to distinguish the difference between weather and climate.

Returning to Webster's:

climate:  the prevailing or average weather conditions of a place, as determined by the temperature and meteorological changes over a period of years.[18]

Because climate is weather characteristics and "changes over a period of years" a clear understanding of climate demands a clear definition of the associated time period. Obviously, we could define climate in terms of whatever period of years we desire, however, because extreme fluctuations in global climate have occurred repeatedly throughout earth's history, it only makes sense to talk of climate in terms of thousands of years. Climate will be discussed in far greater detail in Part 3 of this series.

Since weather is associated with a particular time and place, it is insufficient by itself to suggest global changes in climate. For instance, a series of particularly hot summers and/or mild winters in the northeastern United States is simply a short-term weather trend and cannot be used as evidence of climate change or global warming. Such regional changes are often accompanied by corresponding opposing changes in other regions. Weather trends are simply too short to convincingly argue a case for climate change.

If long-term climate were to change there would be an impact on regional weather cycles. Clearly, weather was quite different in many regions during the last glacial advance of the ice age. Yet, such changes are so gradual and take place over such long time periods that associated weather changes would not be noticed for many generations.

There are many natural phenomena that can affect weather for a period of years without altering long-term climate. Volcanic eruptions are noted for their impact on worldwide weather. In 1815, the 13,000-foot volcanic mountain Tambora on Sumbawa Island in the East Indies erupted with such force that the top 3,700 feet of mountain vanished in a massive cloud of dust and debris that produced what became known as "the year without summer" in 1816.[19] Areas of New England in the United States experienced snowfall in every month of that summer and, as dust continued to filter sunlight, the cooling effect of this eruption lasted for several years until sufficient dust had settled to the ground. Reduced sunlight from smoke and dust of long burning forest fires can temporarily cool affected regions resulting in short periods of cooler weather. However, the byproducts of these fires from the combined effects of increased CO2 from burning and decreased CO2 consumption from photosynthesis are insufficient to produce changes in weather.

In short, weather will respond to long-term climate changes, however, it is insufficient as a predictor of those changes.


Footnotes:

  1. Oberg, James Edward, New Earths, p 50.

  2. Matthews, Willima H. III, Geology Made Simple, p 17.

  3. Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, 2nd College Edition, p 213.

  4. Ibid, p 1103.

  5. Ibid, p 1104.

  6. Ibid, p 1610.

  7. Matthews, Willima H. III, Geology Made Simple, p 17.

  8. Oberg, James Edward, New Earths, pp 50-51.

  9. Ibid, p 55.

  10. Lovelock, J.E., Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth, p 84.

  11. Ice Ages from the Time-Life Books series Planet Earth, p 158.

  12. Easterbrook, Gregg, A Moment On The Earth, p 296.

  13. Summary for Policymakers - A Report of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p 7.

  14. Ray, Dixie Lee, Trashing The Planet, p 33.

  15. The Greening Earth Society, Virtual Climate Alert, August 1, Vol. 2, No. 32.

  16. Lindzen, Dr. Richard S. (Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology, Massachuesetts Institute of Technology) in Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus, 6th paragraph.

  17. Easterbrook, Gregg, A Moment On The Earth, p 295.

  18. Webster's New World Dictionary of the American Language, 2nd College Edition, p 266.

  19. Volcano from the Time-Life Books series Planet Earth, p 60.

[ return to text ]


Suggested reading:

 
Error processing SSI file
Error processing SSI file
Error processing SSI file