If It Ainít Broke
February 10, 2001
by Gary Aldrich - Volume 2, Issue 7
This article appeared on WorldNetDaily.com on Friday, February 7, 2002.
I worked inside the huge federal government for 26 years. My agency enforced federal laws about corruption and abuse that are always a part of large bureaucracies. The incompetence I witnessed was both remarkable and discouraging.
We were attacked on September 11, 2001, and immediately the population turned to the federal government for protection, and President Bush did not let us down. His administration has performed magnificently, and his approval ratings soared immediately and have remained high.
Nobody should be surprised, since the federal government is doing what it was established to do, and itís doing it very well. Protecting the population is the fundamental task of government.
People now trust the government in poll numbers not seen in many years. But when weíre not at war, it almost seems like the federal government gets bored and starts looking around for matters in our personal and local lives to mess with.
Itís not just the loss of liberty and the loss of money out of our paychecks that Iím referring to. A too-large central government breeds discontent in the population. Dislike for oneís own government is not a good thing. People arenít happy when they dislike or distrust their own government.
But, people love the Constitution and Bill of Rights because of what these documents say and stand for. As a companion to these documents, the Federalist Papers spell out much of the thinking of the founders as they struggled to get on paper a balanced form of government they believed would give us great lives, and guarantee our safety and liberty.
One common thread runs through these documents the belief that the federal government should not be involved in local matters. An excellent example of "local matters" are our fire departments and rescue squads. The founders had good reasons to conclude local matters should remain local.
First, they knew men of loftier concerns wouldnít have the interest in local matters that, well, locals would have. They also knew that from a distance they could not possibly run local functions as well as residents of a community could. Thatís just common sense.
But there is another reason why they did not want to meddle in local affairs such as law enforcement and the putting out of fires, because, as Alexander Hamilton wrote in Federalist Number 17,
Now, I donít think anybody would argue that fire departments and rescue squads are not local activity. But the Bush administration is now calling them, "First Responders" and is trying to bring them into the federal tent by giving them funds, new assignments, and training which the administration claims is about new terror attacks.
But when the terror threat ebbs, the feds will still be playing with their new toy, "The First Responders."
Does the federal government want to help the fire department? Fine. Give us our money back, and weíll give the necessary funds to the fire departments and rescue squads. They can tell us what they need, and weíll give them the money and any local law changes that may be necessary. Weíve always supported these groups, without exception itís in our self interest. Why do we need the feds meddling with our fire departments and rescue squads?
When called upon, they know exactly what to do, they have what they need, and they do exactly what we want them to do. After seeing them perform in New York, and Washington, D.C., is there a single person who would claim they need assistance from Washington bureaucrats? God forbid! They sacrificed in a matter that has caused every American to sing these brave local men and womenís praises to the sky, and rightfully so!
So, why is the Bush administration so eager to federalize something that clearly is working so well? Why are they trying to "fix something that ainít broken?" I used to like the Republican Party in part, because they were known as the party of smaller, less expensive and less intrusive government.
What on earth has happened?